PI
PHOTRONICS INC (PLAB)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- PLAB delivered a solid quarter: revenue $210.4M (-0.3% y/y; -0.3% q/q) and non-GAAP EPS $0.51, both ahead of internal expectations and above S&P Global consensus, while GAAP EPS was $0.39 as FX impacts were excluded in non-GAAP adjustments . Q3 Street: revenue $204.3M*, EPS $0.385*; Actual: $210.4M and $0.51 non-GAAP (beat). Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
- Mix: IC revenue softened (-5% y/y/-5% q/q) amid Asia geopolitical/tariff uncertainty, offset by strong FPD (+14% y/y/+14% q/q) on Korea/China mobile and larger AMOLED panels; high-end recovery in the U.S. aided margins .
- Balance sheet and cash flow remained strong: cash & short-term investments $575.8M, operating cash flow $50.1M (24% of revenue), capex $24.8M; buybacks $20.7M and authorization increased by $25M .
- Q4 FY25 guide brackets Street: revenue $201–$209M vs $204.5M* and non-GAAP EPS $0.42–$0.48 vs $0.445*; operating margin guided to 20–22%. Two fewer selling days q/q and six fewer y/y temper near-term outlook. Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- “Revenue, profitability and EPS ahead of expectations,” with non-GAAP EPS of $0.51 and better-than-expected gross/operating margins; U.S. high-end recovery and Korea/China FPD strength drove upside .
- Strong cash generation and disciplined allocation: $50.1M operating cash flow; $24.8M capex (on U.S. capacity, tool replacements); $20.7M buybacks; authorization +$25M .
- Strategic capability build: first U.S. merchant multi‑beam writer installed in Boise; unique U.S. merchant capability for advanced/EUV masks; 3–5 customers qualified, broader ramp over ~6 months .
What Went Wrong
- IC weakness persisted: mainstream IC -12% y/y (Q2) and continued Asia softness in Q3 due to geopolitical trade restrictions and tariff uncertainty affecting customer design releases .
- Margins compressed q/q from mix: gross margin 33.7% vs 36.9% in Q2; management cited mix effects primarily in Asia; rounded commentary referenced ~34% .
- Limited near-term visibility: inherently uneven demand with 1–3 week backlog; Q4 has two fewer selling days than Q3 and six fewer than Q4 last year; management remains cautious .
Financial Results
Headline P&L vs Prior Periods and Estimates
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Segment Revenue
Product Mix Detail (High-End vs Mainstream)
KPIs and Balance Sheet/Cash Flow
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Photronics delivered very good results in our fiscal third quarter with revenue, profitability and EPS ahead of expectations… we will further accelerate internal investment efforts to enhance geographic revenue diversification.” — George Macricostas, CEO .
- “We recognize a recovery in our high-end business resulting from strong order patterns in the U.S.… FPD revenue increased 14% y/y led by strength in Korea.” — Eric Rivera, CFO .
- “This installation marks the first multi-beam writer in production for the merchant market in the U.S.… capable to write the finest resolution EUV and nanoimprint masks.” — George Macricostas and Chris Progler, CTO .
- “We are evaluating capability extensions at a Photronics facility in Asia to extend from 14 down to six nanometer and eight production… expected to contribute to revenue in the latter half of 2027 or 2028.” — George Macricostas .
Q&A Highlights
- Q4 mix expected similar to Q3; geopolitical/tariff issues mainly affect customers’ demand timing; some tariffs on Japan-sourced materials into U.S., not material to date .
- High-end node investments (including multi-beam) target customers like Samsung and other top-tier fabs; Asia 6–8nm expansion planned outside China (e.g., Taiwan/Korea) due to restrictions .
- Multi-beam qualification: 3–5 customers already qualified; about six more months to complete first-pass qualifications; only U.S. merchant multi-beam capability drives strong interest .
- Capital allocation: elevated capex for ~3 years (advanced nodes plus end‑of‑life tool replacements); opportunistic buybacks continue, dividends evaluated but buybacks preferred currently .
- U.S. policy/Intel: stronger Intel and U.S. government work could increase merchant outsourcing; PLAB is the only high-end commercial mask maker in the U.S. and is qualified on trusted products .
Estimates Context
- Q3 2025: Revenue $210.4M vs $204.3M* consensus; Non-GAAP EPS $0.51 vs $0.385* consensus — both beats. Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
- Q4 2025: Guide revenue $201–$209M vs $204.5M* consensus; guide non-GAAP EPS $0.42–$0.48 vs $0.445* consensus — guidance brackets Street. Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
- FY 2025: Consensus revenue $838.1M* and EPS $1.87*; nine-month revenue $633.5M, implying Q4 in line with guidance mid-point. Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Estimates and Guidance Snapshot
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Quality beat on Q3 revenue and EPS despite IC softness; FPD strength and U.S. high-end recovery were the swing factors .
- Near-term tone cautious (geopolitics/tariffs, fewer selling days), but guidance brackets Street, limiting negative estimate revisions risk .
- Strategic moats strengthening: unique U.S. merchant multi-beam capability and planned Asia 6–8nm extensions should expand PLAB’s serviceable high-end TAM and support share gains over multi-year horizon .
- Margin puts/takes: mix pressured gross/operating margins q/q; watch U.S. high-end mix and FPD G8.6 uptake for margin tailwinds; management cited better-than-expected profitability contribution in U.S./Korea .
- Capital deployment balanced: reiteration of ~$200M FY25 capex and authorization increase for buybacks provides both growth investment and shareholder returns; expect elevated capex for ~3 years .
- Regional risk management: business is diversified (Taiwan 33%, China 24%, Korea 21%, U.S.+Europe 22%); tariff impacts on materials modest so far, but Asia demand timing remains sensitive to policy .
- Trading setup: positive beat-and-bracket quarter with visible capability catalysts (multi-beam, U.S. expansion) versus macro/geopolitics headwinds; watch Q4 mix, order timing, and any updates on Asia 6–8nm plan for next leg of the narrative .
Notes:
- All consensus figures marked with an asterisk (*) are Values retrieved from S&P Global.